College of Agricultural, Human, and Natural Resource Sciences

BIOAg

BIOAgFlyer final

The goal of this grant program is to engage a broad, interdisciplinary spectrum of WSU faculty in projects that further the development, understanding, and use of biologically intensive and/or organic principles, practices, and technologies to improve the sustainability of agriculture and food systems in Washington state.

As part of the legislative funding for BIOAg, a competitive grants program was created to stimulate research, extension and education investments by WSU scientists. In addition, BIOAg funding is used to meet three objectives: to stimulate new research initiatives, to augment critical gaps in existing areas of knowledge, and to move existing, game-changing research out into the real world.

Biologically Intensive = farming practices and systems that rely on biological processes which are renewable, non-polluting, and mutually beneficial to both farmers and society.

Funded projects from prior years including progress reports and outcomes can be accessed in the CSANR Grants Database.

Resulting publications are cataloged in the CSANR Publications Library.

 

*** NEW ***

The 2017 BIOAg request for proposals is now available!

 

The goal of the BIOAg solicitation is to engage WSU faculty to advance the development, understanding, and use of biologically-intensive, organic and sustainable agriculture in Washington State. BIOAg funding can be requested for three purposes: to stimulate new research initiatives, to augment existing research to address critical gaps, and to move existing, game-changing research out into the real world.

 

Please read the RFP and application forms carefully; changes have been made from prior solicitations.  The RFP is available on the BIOAg Grant Program webpage.

 

Letter of intent are requested by Nov. 18th, and project proposals are due Dec. 14th.

 

Thanks,

Tara

 

Tara Zimmerman

Associate in Research

206-770-6073

Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources

goldsmitht@wsu.edu

 

Emerging Research Issues for Washington Agriculture 2017 Internal Competitive Grant Program

Request for Proposals A Unified Industry-Based Agriculture Initiative funded by the Washington Legislature provides an internal competitive grants program to address emerging issues facing Washington’s agricultural industries. The grants program is structured to provide greater responsiveness to emerging research and outreach needs of state agricultural industries. As one measure of its success, projects related to the funded proposals were successful in attracting over $22 million of external support for related projects, over $11 million of which has been or will be spent in Washington. Over time the intent still remains to address emerging issues in Washington Agriculture, however, it has become increasingly important to attract federal support for these issues that complements support from commissions.

The program has evolved into a focused effort by the CAHNRS Office of Research to increase competitively funded research from federal agencies and industry that will address emerging issues facing Washington’s agriculture and environment. It is intended to provide seed money to generate preliminary data that will ultimately be used to leverage new support from competitive funding programs and/or from corporations that will bring the best science to bear on Washington’s problems. Thus, proposals that bring together a novel research team or work toward establishing a proof of concept are encouraged. It is also intended to provide funding for taking new directions to fill fundamental knowledge gaps and otherwise enhance our capacity to address significant issues facing Washington Agriculture. The ERI program is not designed for supplementing currently funded projects or as a substitute for other funding. If a proposal might appear to have some overlap with currently funded grants, the proposal must include an explanation of the novelty of the project and the need for funds in the context of current support so that reviewers can evaluate the overlap.

We will give priority to proposals that clearly articulate an alignment with the CAHNRS Office of Research strategic research goals. These are: (1) catalyze transformative discoveries to address agricultural, human, and natural resource challenges in alignment with WSU CAHNRS research aspirations [be strategic], (2) encourage collaborations [be collaborative], and (3) advance WSU CAHNRS reach both nationally and internationally in emerging areas of achievement [be visible].

TIME LINE FOR THE 2016 CALENDAR YEAR GRANT PROGRAM:

Oct 26, 2016 RFP issued Nov 8, 2016 12-1PM, 409 Hulbert Bag Lunch informational meeting for potential Applicants, RSVP to lavine@wsu.edu required.

Dec 2, 2016 Proposals due to CAHNRS Office of Research (electronic submission to ARCGrants@wsu.edu)

Feb 10, 2017 Anticipated announcement of awards

WHAT IS AN EMERGING ISSUE?

In 2007, upon funding by the Washington Legislature, the CAHNRS stakeholder advisory board provided the following guidance when it was asked to identify emerging issues for Washington’s agricultural industries:

  • An emerging issue is a topic where research-based information is needed and where WSU research activity is currently under-invested.
  • Priority should be given to issues that are not commodity specific, and hence, commodity commission or industry funds may not be targeted to address the issue.
  • The research should position WSU to take a leading regional and national position as the topic is recognized as being of regional or national importance.

Research issues are not limited to traditional production agriculture, but may address social and economic issues related to agriculture. Collaborative projects that bring together a team of faculty with complementary skill sets that will comprehensively address an area are encouraged. Projects will be judged based on how well they meet the two criteria below.There are two critical elements by which the proposals will be judged.

A. A description of the emerging issue in Washington and the knowledge gaps that will be filled by the subsequent competitively funded research.

B. A description of how this seed money will be used to generate data that will enhance the competitiveness of efforts to obtain additional external support. Thus a strategy for how this data is critical to enhance the competiveness of subsequent research proposals is essential.

Who is eligible to apply? The lead PI must be a faculty member in a CAHNRS department or hold an ARC faculty appointment if in another college. Research professor track faculty members are eligible to be lead PIs but associates in research, post-doctoral associates, adjunct faculty, and courtesy faculty members are not.

What will be the duration of the grants? The maximum duration is 2 years, starting February 10, 2017. Proposals can be written for 1 year. Initially, funding will be provided only for the first year but to facilitate supporting graduate students, the first year budget can run through June 30, 2018. For a second year of funding, a proposal, which can be identical to the initial proposal, must be submitted at the following year deadline and may be approved, if:

1. Satisfactory progress toward the originally proposed objectives is documented;
2. Applications for significant alternative sources of competitive non-university funds have been submitted through the CAHNRS Office of Research/ARC; and
3. Adequate funds are available. A budget must be submitted for the second year of support.

What funding amounts will be permitted? Grants may be funded up to $80,000 over the possible two-years of a project, with funding for the first year limited to $50,000. Efficiency in using resources will be an important element of the review. That is, proposals will be evaluated based upon projected impact per dollar of funds invested; therefore, the minimum amount essential to accomplish the objectives of the project should be requested. Partial funding may occur, depending on the review and funds available.

Note on Accountability. PIs who have had previous ERI funding must include a brief summary of their accomplishments as a result of the previously funded project.

WHAT CRITERIA WILL BE USED TO EVALUATE PROPOSALS?

Ability of the project to define and address an emerging issue. (25 points)

The proposal should clearly describe why the subject of the proposal should be considered to be an Emerging Issue. The rationale and significance of the problem must be clearly articulated, including how stakeholders might ultimately benefit from completion of the competitively funded research, the information gaps to be filled (the researchable questions) and how the research will contribute to an overall solution. The intended output of research conducted under the ERI is to enhance the competitiveness of subsequent proposals.

Ability of project to catalyze future extramural support. (25 points)

A primary objective of this grant program is to encourage faculty to develop preliminary data that will enhance the competitiveness of future competitive grant proposals. This anticipated outcome(s) must be clearly delineated. Potential funding sources and the project leaders’ strategy for developing a competitive proposal are required elements of the proposal.

Anticipated competitive extramural grant applications that will be facilitated by the use of these funds must be explicitly described in the grant proposal (agency, program, application deadline). Requests for second-year funding must be accompanied by documentation that competitive extramural grant application(s) have been submitted.

Appropriate research methodologies and approaches (20 points)

The proposals will be reviewed to evaluate whether the approach and methodology, as articulated, are sufficient to accomplish the stated objectives. This should also include extension activities as appropriate.

Interdisciplinary, team-based approach to address the issue(s) (10 points)

Not all emerging issues are interdisciplinary in nature; but for the many that are, it is important to describe the multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary components of the project. The formation of teams to address the emerging issues is strongly recommended.

Faculty capacity to successfully complete the project (10 points)

The researchers listed for the project should be actively involved in the project and have a documented history of research productivity that is appropriate for the research being proposed. The specific role of each faculty member listed on the proposal must be explicitly and clearly described and the component of the project that depends on each faculty member’s effort must be stated. Is the budget appropriate?

Contributions to graduate education (10 points)

In support of one of the most broadly identified benchmarks at WSU and in CAHNRS, faculty are encouraged to support Ph.D. graduate students through this program, recognizing that funding beyond one year (up to a maximum of two) is not guaranteed and the faculty member and/or department must be willing to continue the support of the student beyond the duration of ERI support.

Separation from currently funded projects.

If the project appears to be a routine continuation, component or supplementation of significant currently funded research, it is not eligible for ERI funding.

Note the following definitions of targeted deliverables:

  • Outputs can be products such as journal publications, web-based information, other publications, presentations, workshops, seminars, or other tangible items, activities, or events
  • Outcomes are new or modified behaviors, practices, or policies in Washington that result largely from the efforts and outputs of a project or program.
  • Impacts are the expected or potential social, economic and/or environmental benefits to specific audiences and the broader society that could be attributed to a project.

Proposal Guidelines
1. The text of the proposal should not exceed six (6) pages, must address each of the evaluation criteria, and must include:

  1. Title, lead PI name, department, and contact information; cooperating PI(s) name(s), department(s) and contact information
  2. Requested duration
  3. Amount requested for the first year and estimate of the funding to be requested in the second year, if applicable
  4. Project abstract, including brief description of Emerging Issue(s) being addressed and the research strategy that is proposed. (half page)
  5. Problem Statement including rationale and significance of the problem from the perspective of Washington stakeholders. It should be made clear how the research conducted in this project will close existing gaps in our ability to conduct research that addresses an Emerging Issue for Washington’s stakeholders
  6. Objectives
  7. Research Methodology. Intended outputs must be clearly stated
  8. Describe how these results will be critical in positioning the group to successfully obtain extramural funding. A significant part of the evaluation will be to critically evaluate the project leader’s strategy for using these funds as a foundation for obtaining additional competitive funds.
  9. Description of the Team and Each Person’s Responsibility
  10. Anticipated Competitive Extramural Grant Application(s) that will emerge from this project (agency, program, application deadline)
  11. Graduate Student Participation in the project, including the name of the graduate degree program in which the student(s) will enroll. These students may be supported by the project or have other relationships to it.

For a second year of funding, a proposal, which can be identical to the initial proposal, must be submitted at the following year deadline and may be approved, if:

  1. satisfactory progress toward the originally proposed objectives is documented in a progress report of four pages or less;
  2. applications for significant alternative sources of competitive non-university funds have been submitted through the CAHNRS Office of Research/ARC;
  3. it contains a budget for the second year of support that lists the amount received in the first year, first year funds remaining, the amount requested for the second year and a plan for how the second year money would be spent and;
  4. adequate funds are available.

2. Appended materials (these are not part of the six-page limit)

      a. Progress Report (≤4 pages) and summary of results from previous ERI project(s) (1 page), if applicable
      b. Reference citations from the body of the proposal
      c. One- or two-page CV of each faculty member participating in the project as PI or co- PI. (Note: Only two pages of each CV will be sent to the reviewers.
      d. One page detailed budget including a description of any matching or leveraged dollars. Do not include any F&A. All salaries and wages must be included but not benefits. Do not include graduate student tuition. Graduate Students should be paid at the Graduate Research Assistantship levels. Salary and benefits for permanent faculty and staff cannot be paid from the requested funds. Resource use efficiency should be clear in the Research Methodology and Approach, and in the Extension plan
      e. Completed Assurance Form
      f. Completed Current and Pending Support Form
      g. Discussion of overlap of the proposal with currently funded research.

All proposals must follow the format shown below: Max.

Page Length: Proposal: Six (6) pages or less Appended Materials: no limit but don’t forget that the interest of reviewers may be limited

Font: Times New Roman, 12 pt. or larger Margins: 1” margins top, bottom, both sides

Software: Microsoft Word (you may also submit a PDF if you anticipate formatting problems.) Budget in Excel

Exclusions: Do NOT include any type of header/footer   Submit the proposal electronically to the CAHNRS Office of Research/ARC by 5 PM, December 2, 2016. . All proposals must be emailed to ARCGrants@wsu.edu and lavine@wsu.edu. The staff of the Office of Research/ARC will acknowledge receipt of a readable proposal within one working day after submission.

Review Process: All proposals will be reviewed by a panel that consists of the Associate Dean for Research & Director of the ARC, the Assistant Director of the ARC, and a panel of faculty from CAHNRS serving as members of the CAHNRS Associate Dean for Research’s Faculty Advisory Council, and ad hoc reviewers as needed.

NOTES:

Questions: If you have questions about this RFP, please contact the CAHNRS Office of Research/ARC by email at ARCGrants@wsu.edu or lavine@wsu.edu. If we need to post a FAQ, it will be accessible through the ARC web site [cahnrs.wsu.edu/research/].

Acknowledgment: All publications, posters, websites, field day presentations, etc. resulting from this internal competitive grant program must include the following information: “This activity was funded, in part, with an Emerging Research Issues Internal Competitive Grant from the Washington State University, College of Agricultural, Human, and Natural Resource Sciences, Agricultural Research Center project WNP00xxx.”

Final Report: A final report is required for each project at the end of the approved funding period. Appropriate metrics (outputs) should be included in the final report that will be indicative of science-based research that will help achieve longer-term objectives associated with the emerging issues. A list of anticipated publications, field days, website URLs, etc. should be included in the Final Report. Within six months of the completion of the proposal, project leader must provide a copy of a proposal submitted to a competitive funding source or to a corporate sponsor. Additional details concerning reporting will be provided to those receiving awards.

Agricultural Research Center programs and employment are available to all without discrimination. Evidence of noncompliance may be reported to the WSU Center for Human Rights at chr@wsu.edu and 509-335-8288.

Full 2017 RFP with Assurance Statement

Award Archive

Summary of 2014 Awards-here Summary of 2013 Awards-here Archived Record of Past Years click here

BIOAgFlyer final

The goal of this grant program is to engage a broad, interdisciplinary spectrum of WSU faculty in projects that further the development, understanding, and use of biologically intensive and/or organic principles, practices, and technologies to improve the sustainability of agriculture and food systems in Washington state.

As part of the legislative funding for BIOAg, a competitive grants program was created to stimulate research, extension and education investments by WSU scientists. In addition, BIOAg funding is used to meet three objectives: to stimulate new research initiatives, to augment critical gaps in existing areas of knowledge, and to move existing, game-changing research out into the real world.

Biologically Intensive = farming practices and systems that rely on biological processes which are renewable, non-polluting, and mutually beneficial to both farmers and society.

Funded projects from prior years including progress reports and outcomes can be accessed in the CSANR Grants Database.

Resulting publications are cataloged in the CSANR Publications Library.

 

*** NEW ***

The 2017 BIOAg request for proposals is now available!

 

The goal of the BIOAg solicitation is to engage WSU faculty to advance the development, understanding, and use of biologically-intensive, organic and sustainable agriculture in Washington State. BIOAg funding can be requested for three purposes: to stimulate new research initiatives, to augment existing research to address critical gaps, and to move existing, game-changing research out into the real world.

 

Please read the RFP and application forms carefully; changes have been made from prior solicitations.  The RFP is available on the BIOAg Grant Program webpage.

 

Letter of intent are requested by Nov. 18th, and project proposals are due Dec. 14th.

 

Thanks,

Tara

 

Tara Zimmerman

Associate in Research

206-770-6073

Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources

goldsmitht@wsu.edu

 

Vogel Research Fund

The Orville A. Vogel Wheat Research Fund was established to support production-oriented wheat research and to encourage basic and applied research directed towards identifying factors that limit the maximum production capability of wheat grown in the Pacific Northwest.

Vogel RFP 2016

Electronically submit your proposal  to this office (arcgrants@wsu.edu) no later than November 16, 2015 by 5:00pm. If you have any questions, please contact Laura Lavine (509)335-4563 or lavine@wsu.edu).

Investment for Future Success (IFS) Program

The goal of the IFS program is to facilitate the success of ARC researchers and CAHNRS faculty in obtaining federal competitive grants. ARC resources will fund specific pieces of the work related to unsuccessful federal competitive proposals (those that did well in review, just not well enough to be funded) and will be made available through an internal, competitive process.

Investment-for-Future-Success-2015

If you have questions about this RFP, please contact the CAHNRS Office of Research/ARC by email at ARCGrants@wsu.edu or lavine@wsu.edu.

CVM-CAHNRS Livestock Health and Food Security

2017 Internal Competitive Grant Program

Request for Proposals

CVM-CAHNRS-Application Form

The CVM Animal Health Research Center and the CAHNRS Office of Research will collaborate this year to launch a new joint internal grant program that will fund two projects focused on livestock health as it relates to food security. Proposals must be submitted by interdisciplinary teams comprising both CVM and CAHNRS faculty. Up to $80,000 over a two year period can be requested, with a maximum of $50,000 requested in a single year.

The purpose of this program is to provide seed money to leverage new extramural support that will bring the best science to bear on critical problems facing livestock health and/or production and the resulting impact on sustaining a quality food supply. Proposals that bring together a novel research team and work toward establishing a proof of concept are encouraged. This program is also intended to provide funding for taking new directions to fill fundamental knowledge gaps and otherwise enhance our capacity to address the issues of livestock health, production, and food security in the state of Washington, the nation, and the world. This joint program is not designed for supplementing currently funded projects or as a substitute for other funding. If a proposal appears to have overlap with currently funded grants, the proposal must include an explanation of the novelty of the project and the need for funds in the context of current support so that reviewers can evaluate the overlap.

We will give priority to proposals that clearly articulate an alignment with the CVM and the CAHNRS Office of Research strategic research goals. These are:

  • Catalyze transformative discoveries to address challenges facing livestock health and sustainable safe food production.
  • Encourage collaborations between CVM and CAHNRS faculty.
  • Advance the reach of the CVM and CAHNRS nationally and internationally.

TIME LINE:

May 16, 2017                 RFP issued

June 27, 2017                Pre-Proposals due to Julie Smith in the CVM Dean’s Office by 5pm (electronic submission to (jksmith@vetmed.wsu.edu)

July 11, 2017                 Notification of proposals selected for full submission

August 22, 2017            Full proposals due to Julie Smith in the CVM Dean’s Office by 5pm (electronic submission to (jksmith@vetmed.wsu.edu)

September 12, 2017      Anticipated announcement of awards

 

Who is eligible to apply?

The lead PI must be a faculty member in CVM or CAHNRS, and there must be at least one faculty Co-PI or Co-I from the other participating college (either CAHNRS or CVM). In other words, a multidisciplinary team of investigators comprising faculty from both CVM and CAHNRS is a requirement. Research or clinical track faculty members are eligible to be lead PIs and Co-PIs/Co-Is, but associates in research, post-doctoral associates, adjunct faculty, and courtesy faculty members are not.

What will be the duration of the grants?

The maximum duration is two years, starting September 12, 2017. Proposals can be written for 1 year. Initially, funding will be provided only for the first year. For a second year of funding, a proposal, which can be identical to the initial proposal, must be submitted at the following year deadline and may be approved, if:

  • Satisfactory progress toward the originally proposed objectives is documented;
  • Applications for significant alternative sources of competitive extramural funds have been submitted through either the CVM or the CAHNRS Office of Research/ARC; and
  • Adequate funds are available. A budget must be submitted for the second year of support.

What funding amounts will be permitted?

Grants may be funded up to $80,000 over the possible two years of a project, with funding for the first year limited to $50,000. Efficiency in using resources will be an important element of the review. That is, proposals will be evaluated based upon projected impact per dollar of funds invested; therefore, the minimum amount essential to accomplish the objectives of the project should be requested. Partial funding may occur, depending on the review and funds available.

What criteria will be used to evaluate proposals?

  1. Ability of the project to define and address a critical issue affecting livestock health and/or production and its impact on the ability to provide a sustainable quality food supply.
    The rationale and significance of the problem must be clearly articulated, including how stakeholders might ultimately benefit from completion of the competitively funded research, the information gaps to be filled (the researchable questions) and how the research will contribute to an overall solution. Projects focused on plant health/production are not excluded as long as there is a clear impact on food security.
  2. Ability of project to catalyze future extramural support.
    A primary objective of this joint program is to encourage CVM and CAHNRS faculty to develop interdisciplinary collaborations to generate preliminary data that will enhance the competitiveness of future competitive extramural grant proposals. This anticipated outcome must be clearly delineated. Potential funding sources and the project leaders’ strategy for developing a competitive proposal are required elements of the proposal. Anticipated competitive extramural grant applications that will be facilitated by the use of these funds must be explicitly described in the grant proposal (agency, program, application deadline). Requests for a second year of funding must be accompanied by documentation that competitive extramural grant application(s) have been submitted.
  3. Interdisciplinary, team-based approach to address the issue.
    Another major objective of this joint program is to encourage CVM and CAHNRS faculty to develop interdisciplinary collaborations. It will be important to describe the multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary components of the project. The formation of teams to address the emerging issues is strongly recommended.
  4. Appropriate research methodologies and approaches.
    The proposals will be reviewed to evaluate whether the approach and methodology, as articulated, are sufficient to accomplish the stated objectives. This could also include extension activities as appropriate.
  5. Faculty capacity to successfully complete the project.
    The investigators listed for the project should be actively involved in the project and have a documented history of research productivity that is appropriate for the research being proposed. The specific role of each faculty member listed on the proposal must be explicitly and clearly described and the component of the project that depends on each faculty member’s effort must be stated.
  6. Separation from currently funded projects and appropriate budget.
    If the project appears to be a routine continuation, component or supplementation of significant currently funded research, it is not eligible for funding through this program. The budget must appropriately reflect the actual costs of the proposed research and must be well-justified.

APPLICATION PROCEDURE

A pre-proposal is required and must be submitted by the June 13, 2017 deadline, using the following format:

  1. Title of proposal
  2. Lead PI name and contact information including faculty title, college, and department
  3. Co-PI(s) and/or Co-investigator(s) names and contact information including faculty title, college, and department
  4. Duration of the project
  5. Amount requested for the first year and estimate of amount to be requested in the second year, if applicable
  6. Overall hypothesis and specific aims
  7. Project abstract, including brief description of the problem being addressed and the research strategy that is proposed.
  8. Brief description of how results will be critical in positioning the group to successfully obtain extramural funding, including the extramural agency(s) and programs that will be targeted
  9. Potential impact the proposed research will have on solving the problem

Pre-proposals must not exceed two pages using 11 point or larger font and margins at least 0.75” (top, bottom, both sides).

Pre-proposals will be reviewed by a panel that consists of the CVM Associate Dean for Research & Director of the Animal Health Research Center, the Chair of the CVM Research Committee, the CAHNRS Associate Dean for Research & Director of the Agricultural Research Center, the CAHNRS Assistant Director of the Agricultural Research Center, and ad hoc reviewers from both the CVM and CAHNRS as needed.

Up to six pre-proposals will be selected for submission as full proposals. Lead PIs will be notified of their pre-proposal status by June 27, 2017. If selected, full proposals must be submitted by the August 8, 2017 deadline, and must follow the guidelines below:

FULL PROPOSAL GUIDELINES

If selected to submit a full proposal, please adhere to the page limits given for each section. Use 11 point font or larger and keep the margin size greater than 0.75 inches. All applications must contain all of the following sections.

A. Cover page (use attached form):

The cover page must be signed by the PI and Co-PI/Co-I from BOTH colleges and the Department or Unit chairs from BOTH colleges to verify the information. Failure to provide any of this information will result in administrative rejection of the grant proposal.

B. Abstract page (use attached form):

State the application’s broad long-term objectives, hypothesis, and specific aims, including how the current proposal relates to your long-term research goals. Describe concisely the research design
and methods for achieving these goals. This description is meant to serve as a succinct and accurate description of the proposed work when separated from the application. DO NOT EXCEED 300 WORDS

C. Key Personnel page (use attached form):

Please list all critical personnel, their position, home department and college, location (if not on the Pullman Campus), role on the project and percent effort dedicated to the project.

D. Detailed budget page (use attached form).

E. Budget justification page (use attached form):

Clearly justify the requested supplies, reagents, animal costs etc. Faculty salaries cannot be requested. Graduate student, research associate (post-doc/technician), and time-slip salaries can be requested up to a maximum of 50% of the overall budget. Equipment requests cannot exceed $5,000 and must be essential for the conduct of the study. Travel costs should be kept to a minimum.

F. Biosketches (3 page limit per person)

Biosketches must be included for all key personnel. Information that must be included:

  1. The education or training of the person.
  2. A personal statement clearly indicating the role of the person in the project and why they are qualified to perform this function.
  3. Relevant honors, awards, professional experience can also be included.
  4. Publications: A maximum of 10 of the most relevant publications should be included. These should support the expertise of the person for their proposed role.
  5. Other research funding sources: All other funding sources must be listed, including the title, funding agency and mechanism, e.g. USDA, NIH (R01, R21 etc…), the role of the person on the project, e.g. PI or co-investigator, The % effort dedicated to each project must also be clearly stated, along with the current annual direct costs and a short description of the project (2-3 lines). Any potential scientific and/or budgetary overlap with the proposed work must be clearly explained.

G. SPECIFIC AIMS (one page limit)

This page should summarize the rationale and significance of the proposed research. A very brief summary of the current knowledge should be outlined, the gap is in our knowledge clearly stated and how the proposed studies will address this gap elucidated. The central hypothesis of the project should be highlighted and the Specific Aims that will test this hypothesis outlined. Any innovation of approach should also be specified. Lastly, the expected outcomes and impact of the proposed studies should be clearly summarized.

H. RESEARCH PLAN (5 page limit for subsections 1-7; no page limit for References)

Provide each of the following subsections. If multiple specific aims are proposed, repeat sections 3-6 for each aim.

  1. Significance. Recommended up to 3/4 page and should clearly outline the significance of the proposed research.
  2. Background and Rationale. Recommended up to one page and should concisely summarize the existing literature supporting the rationale for the proposed studies. This section can also include supporting preliminary data or proposed models. Use of figures is encouraged.
  3. Experimental Design. This section needs to describe concisely the planned experiments. Due to space limitations, detailed protocols should be referenced. This section should describe the overall experimental approach, making it very clear what the goal of each experiment is, as well as justifying the feasibility and choice of the approach. Although not required, any available supporting preliminary data should be provided here to justify the feasibility of the approach.
  4. Expected outcomes. A description of the predicted results MUST be included, as well as how these findings will advance the field
  5. Potential Problems and Alternative Approaches. These MUST be addressed in the proposal.
  6. Statistical Analysis (required). Provide a brief description justifying the sample size used for each experiment and the statistical analysis that will be used.
  7. Timeline. Provide a table or brief description of the timeline for the proposed experiments, manuscript preparation and grant submission.
  8. References (not included in 5 page limit). Provide sufficient references to allow the reviewers to understand the proposal background, significance, and proposed approach. All references must include the author’s names, year of publication, the full title of the article, the journal name, volume and page numbers.
  9. OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION (no page limits)

I. How will this intramural grant help secure extramural funding?

A primary objective of this joint program is to encourage CVM and CAHNRS faculty to develop interdisciplinary collaborations to generate preliminary data that will enhance the competitiveness of future competitive extramural grant proposals. This anticipated outcome must be clearly delineated. Anticipated competitive extramural grant applications that will be facilitated by the use of these funds must be explicitly described (agency, program, application deadline). Note: requests for a second year of funding must be accompanied by documentation that competitive extramural grant application(s) have been submitted.

J. How successful were you in leveraging prior intramural/internal grant(s)?

If applicable, please list the intramural/internal grants that you have received over the past 5 years. For each grant, list the (directly) resultant publications and extramural grant applications (submitted/pending/funded/not funded).

K. Regulatory compliance information (Vertebrate animals, recombinant DNA, and biohazards)

Although regulatory compliance approval is not required for this submission, please provide the following information for review purposes.

  1. 1. VERTEBRATE ANIMALS. If not applicable state N/A.
    If vertebrate animals will be used, the following 5 sections must be addressed:

    • Proposed Use of Animals: This section must state how many animals will be used and clearly state how this number is justified.
    • Justification of the use of animals: This section must clearly state why animals have to be used and why there are no viable alternatives.
    • Veterinary Care: The housing and care of the animals must be clearly stated
    • Procedures: This section should include how pain and suffering will be minimalized.
    • Euthanasia: Briefly state what procedures will be followed for euthanasia and state whether they are consistent with the recommendations of the Panel on Euthanasia of the American Veterinary Medical association, and with the guidelines laid down by the Washington State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)
  2. Recombinant DNA. If not applicable state N/A. If recombinant DNA will be used, briefly describe the types of vector systems to be used, and whether transgenic animals or plants will be generated. State whether a BAF is approved, pending, or in preparation.
  3. Biohazards. If not applicable state N/A. Otherwise, describe any potentially biohazardous material or agents to be used, and whether a BAF is approved, pending, or in preparation.

Submit the proposal electronically to Julie Smith in the CVM Dean’s Office by 5pm, August 8, 2017. All proposals must be emailed to jksmith@vetmed.wsu.edu

Review Process:

All proposals will be reviewed by a panel that consists of the CVM Associate Dean for Research & Director of the Animal Health Research Center, the Chair of the CVM Research Committee, the CAHNRS Associate Dean for Research & Director of the Agricultural Research Center, the CAHNRS Assistant Director of the Agricultural Research Center, and ad hoc reviewers from both the CVM and CAHNRS as needed.

Questions:

If you have questions about this RFP, please contact Robert Mealey, CVM Associate Dean for Research (rhm@vetmed.wsu.edu) or Laura Lavine, CAHNRS Assistant Director of the ARC (lavine@wsu.edu).

Acknowledgment:

All publications, posters, websites, field day presentations, etc. resulting from this internal competitive grant program must include the following information: “This activity was funded, in part, with a Livestock Health and Food Security Internal Competitive Grant from the Washington State University, College of Veterinary Medicine and College of Agricultural, Human, and Natural Resource Sciences, Agricultural Research Center.”

Final Report:

A final report is required for each project at the end of the approved funding period. Appropriate metrics (outputs) should be included in the final report that will be indicative of science-based research that will help achieve longer-term objectives associated livestock health/food security. A list of anticipated publications, field days, website URLs, etc. should be included in the Final Report. Within six months of the completion of the project, project leaders must provide a copy of an extramural proposal submitted to a competitive funding source or to a corporate sponsor. Additional details concerning reporting will be provided to those receiving awards.

Correct!

Incorrect